Ethical Guidelines

Ethics and Malpractices Statement

Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Health Horizons (JIAHH) is steadfast in its commitment to maintaining the highest standards of ethical conduct throughout the publication process. We uphold rigorous expectations for ethical behavior from all parties involved in the publication ecosystem, including authors, editors, and reviewers.

JIAHH is dedicated to ensuring exemplary standards of critical scholarly review and professional publishing judgment. By implementing comprehensive peer review procedures alongside meticulous editorial assessments, JIAHH functions as an intellectual gatekeeper, guaranteeing that only high-quality scholarship is accepted for publication.

To further this mission, we have established the following publication ethics and malpractice statements, delineating the specific responsibilities of all parties involved to ensure compliance with internationally recognized guidelines for ethical and culturally competent research.

Responsibilities of the Editors

Academic Merit Evaluation: Editors are tasked with evaluating all submitted articles solely on their academic merit, which includes significance, timeliness, relevance, originality, and clarity.

Impartiality in Review: Editors will not consider the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnic origin, language, citizenship, religious beliefs, or institutional affiliation in their evaluation process.

Integrity of the Published Record: Editors are responsible for maintaining the integrity of the published record by issuing corrections and retractions when necessary and investigating any suspected or alleged research and publication misconduct.

Confidentiality: Editors and management staff must not disclose any information regarding a submitted article to anyone other than the corresponding author, editorial reviewers, potential peer reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher as required.

Use of Unpublished Material: No editor shall utilize unpublished material disclosed in a submitted manuscript for personal research purposes.

Language and Formatting Quality: Editors are responsible for ensuring that the language quality of articles meets the required standards and that authors adhere to all formatting and guideline specifications before the peer review process begins.

Fair Peer Review Process: Editors are committed to ensuring a fair and appropriate double-blind peer-review process for all submitted articles.

Expert Reviewer Selection: Editors must select reviewers based on their expertise relevant to the submitted manuscript.

Regional Representation in Review: At least one reviewer should be from or focus on the country or region relevant to the manuscript.

Diverse Review Expertise: Each manuscript should be reviewed by a minimum of one international (foreign) expert and one national (local) expert of international repute.

Conflict of Interest Management: Submissions from authors with any conflict of interest with the Editor(s) will be assessed, evaluated, and processed by another editorial member to ensure impartiality.

Editorial Integrity in Self-Submissions: Submissions by an editor(s) will be assigned to another editorial member to uphold a fair and unbiased review process.

Disclosure of Competing Interests: Editors will require all contributors to disclose any relevant competing interests and will publish corrections if such interests are revealed post-publication.

Expertise of Editorial Members: All editorial members (editors and advisors) must possess expertise in the relevant field and maintain an international reputation in academic research.

Publication Decision Authority: Editors are responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal will be published, based on the validation of the work, its significance to researchers, scholars, and readers, the reviewers’ comments, and adherence to current legal requirements concerning libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism.

Collaborative Decision-Making: The Editor-in-Chief will consult with editors, advisors, and reviewers during the decision-making processes to ensure a comprehensive and fair evaluation of submissions.

Through these guidelines, JIAHH aims to foster an ethical publication environment that upholds the integrity of academic research and contributes positively to the scholarly community.

Responsibilities of the Reviewers

Self-Assessment of Qualifications: Any reviewer selected to evaluate a manuscript must conduct a self-assessment of their qualifications. If a referee feels inadequately prepared to provide an insightful review of the research detailed in the article, or if their participation would delay the review process, they must promptly inform the Editor and excuse themselves from the review assignment.

Confidentiality of Manuscripts: It is imperative that all reviewers treat the manuscripts they receive as confidential documents. The insights and evaluations contained within these manuscripts should not be disclosed to anyone outside of the review process, ensuring the integrity and privacy of the research until officially published.

Objective Double-Blind Review: The essence of the double-blind peer review process lies in its objectivity. Reviewers are tasked with articulating their opinions clearly and supportively, basing their assessments on well-reasoned arguments, and credible evidence drawn from the manuscript itself. This allows for a constructive feedback loop that ultimately enhances the quality of scholarly work.

Identifying Relevant Literature: Reviewers play a crucial role in upholding the standard of academic rigor. They should diligently identify and recommend any relevant published work that the authors may have overlooked, ensuring that the manuscript is appropriately contextualized within the existing body of literature.

Respecting Intellectual Property: Reviewers must refrain from utilizing any unpublished material disclosed in a submitted manuscript for their personal research endeavors, unless they have obtained express written consent from the author(s). This respect for intellectual property is fundamental to maintaining trust within the academic community.

Responsibilities of the Publisher

Addressing Misconduct and Integrity Issues: In the event of alleged or confirmed misconduct, fraudulent publications, or instances of plagiarism, ScinenceIngress (SI) publishers’ commits to taking decisive action in collaboration with the Editors. This may involve prompt publication of an erratum, a detailed clarification, or in severe cases, the retraction of the affected manuscript. Upholding the integrity of scholarly communication is paramount in such situations.

Commitment to Accessibility: As a dedicated publisher, SI emphasizes the enduring availability and preservation of scholarly research. The publisher actively engages in partnerships and initiatives aimed at maintaining its digital archives, ensuring that the knowledge produced is easily accessible and preserved for future generations.

Correction of Published Works: Should inaccuracies, misleading statements, or erroneous explanations be identified in a published article, SI will take immediate action to correct the record. It is essential that published research reflects the highest standards of accuracy and integrity.

Complaint Resolution Protocol: SI is committed to transparency in handling all complaints related to the published works. All grievances will be forwarded to the Editor-in-Chief, who will diligently investigate these matters, regardless of who submits the complaint. Upholding the trust of the academic community hinges on the Publisher’s responsiveness to issues raised concerning published work.

Responsibilities of the Authors

Pre-Submission Language Review: Authors bear the responsibility of ensuring that their manuscripts undergo a thorough review and editing process by an expert in the English language before submission to the “Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Health Horizons (JIAHH)” . This step is crucial for enhancing clarity and coherence, thereby optimizing the chances of acceptance.

Compliance with Reference Formatting: The reference list must fully adhere to the guidelines set forth by the APA (American Psychological Association).. Style guide. Authors can leverage the availability of dedicated style files for citation management software like Endnote and Zotero, Mandalay ensuring proper formatting of their references.

In-Text Citation Accuracy: Authors are expected to apply a consistent in-text citation style throughout their manuscripts, thereby aligning it with the reference list presented at the end. This practice reflects a rigor in scholarly research and acknowledges the contributions of previous work.

Ethical Submission Practices: The corresponding author is tasked with confirming that the manuscript is not concurrently submitted for publication or under review elsewhere. This underscores the importance of ethical publishing practices and respect for the editorial process.

Conflict of Interest Disclosure: The corresponding author must ensure that there are no existing conflicts of interest between the principal author and co-authors. Transparency in this regard fosters trust and accountability within the research community.

Plagiarism Prevention: Authors have an obligation to ensure that their manuscript is free from plagiarism or excessive similarity to existing works. This includes accurately citing any data, ideas, or interpretations derived from external sources in accordance with established international standards.

Adherence to Research Ethics: It is incumbent upon authors and co-authors to rigorously follow international research ethics standards. This includes ensuring the integrity, validity, and ethical implications of their work at all stages of the research and publication process.

Comprehensive Affiliation Information: During manuscript submission, authors must provide complete affiliation details for themselves and any co-authors. This includes information about all associated institutions, reflecting the collaborative nature of academic research.

Ensuring Exclusivity in Submission: The corresponding author must ensure that the manuscript, once accepted for peer review, is not concurrently submitted or published elsewhere, unless it has been officially rejected by JIAHH. This policy preserves the integrity of the review process and protects the rights of authors and publishers alike.

Signed Agreement for Publication Rights: Authors are required to provide a signed agreement granting JIAHH the right to disseminate the article along with any derivative works, including translations. This agreement ensures clarity regarding intellectual property rights and the publisher's ability to promote the work effectively.

Thorough Review of Submission Guidelines: Authors are responsible for meticulously reviewing and adhering to the submission guidelines outlined by JIAHH. It is essential to fulfill all requisite conditions and requirements prior to manuscript submission to mitigate delays and enhance the likelihood of acceptance.

Through these comprehensive responsibilities, all parties involved in the publication process contribute to the integrity, quality, and ethical standards of scholarly communication. Each role, from reviewer to author to publisher, is vital in fostering a trustworthy academic landscape.